The
other side of the NGOs
Linda
Sinah Kim
NGO (Non-Government Organization)
seems to be a perfect place for the work, but just like all the other things,
nothing can be perfect. If there is a good news, that can be a bad news, and if
there is a bad news, it can also be a good news. And it is applied just into
the NGOs. There is many advantages of the NGO, but this advantages can also
turn into disadvantages.
In NGO, unlike the things that’s shown, real
situation is sometimes not going well. Because of the “pure” trait of the NGO,
there are some things that we cannot understand. Sometimes, workers in the NGO
even say they feel stuffiness of the system. Because I wanted to know more
about the other part of the NGO, I had an imaginary interview with Mr.Shin who works at
one NGO.
“Hello Mr. Shin, I am a
high school student from Saemmul High school. Today, I want to talk about the
irrationality of the NGO.” We talked about the reasons why the NGOs cannot be
smooth all the time, and why they cannot say what’s right and what’s wrong.
NGOs don’t have a
government, so they don’t have to care about the government. So it has an
advantage that they can act just as they want, but it also has a disadvantage
by this trait. They don’t have a government that takes care of the organization
and keep them safe. But actually this trait also helps them to be safe
sometimes.
For example, if one visits
Somalia, maybe it might be even impossible to visit Somalia but any way, he/she
will be gunned down by a pirate or kidnapped. But since the pirates know that the
only people who can help them are the NGOs, they would rather protect the
organizations.
It also become another
problem. In our eyes, pirates are just villain! But helping this villain? And
even being protected by villain? It might seem to be really weird to the
others. Sometimes, there are even some news saying one NGO is the same side
with the pirates.
Maybe some enthusiastic
person might want to say the right thing to the villains. Some might not want
to take care of the bad people who harassed many people. But it’s not something
NGOs can do. They are the organization who cannot say there will be a terror
even if they knew it before.
I was really shocked by
this truth that some NGO’s keep the neutrality, so they cannot prevent the
terror even if they know that the terror will happen. Actually, it is a real contradiction
that the people who help the people by some terrors or wars cannot prevent it
even if they know it.
Nevertheless, I still want to go into the MSF (one of the
NGOs) since even if I cannot protect the war, I can still help even if it is
just a small hand. If the war or terror is something that’s keep happening in
the world, I want to be a small help for the ones who get hurt from it.
It is quite interesting that you tried 'imaginary interview'. I could agree with many parts of your essay, and I think mentioning Somalia's example helped me a lot in the way of understanding your essay.
ReplyDeleteIt would be much better essay if you added some direct quotes from your 'imaginary interview' in order to make good use of it. And I could also find some words that might be better if replaced by other words. (For example, at the last paragraph 'even if I cannot protect the war' with 'even if I cannot prevent the war')
Anyway, I think your essay about 'disadvantages of NGOs' is very unique. (I think it's directly opposing Annie's essay, haha) And here's my question; You've told me that the source of your 'imaginary interview' is a book. So, what's the title of the book?
p.s. please put title on your essay :(
Delete(I added one this time)